• recategorized by
410 views
1 1 vote

Modern warfare has changed from large scale clashes of armies to suppression of civilian populations. Chemical agents that do their work silently appear to be suited to such warfare; and regretfully, there exist people in military establishments who think that chemical agents are useful tools for their cause.

Which of the following statements best sums up the meaning of the above passage:

  1. Modern warfare has resulted in civil strife.
  2. Chemical agents are useful in modern warfare.
  3. Use of chemical agents in warfare would be undesirable.
  4. People in military establishments like to use chemical agents in war.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Position:
Show:

Related questions

1 1 vote
0 0 answers
438
438 views
admin asked Sep 3, 2022
438 views
The horse has played a little known but very important role in the field of medicine. Horses were injected with toxins of diseases until their blood built up immunities. ...
0 0 votes
0 0 answers
466
466 views
Milicevic3306 asked Mar 25, 2018
466 views
One of the legacies of the Roman legions was discipline. In the legions, military law prevailed and discipline was brutal. Discipline on the battlefield kept units obedie...
3 3 votes
2 answers 2 answers
948
948 views
Arjun asked Feb 19, 2021
948 views
Computers are ubiquitous. They are used to improve efficiency in almost all fields from agriculture to space exploration. Artificial intelligence $\text{(AI)}$ is current...
2 2 votes
4 answers 4 answers
1.2k
1.2k views
go_editor asked Feb 13, 2020
1,206 views
The Canadian constitution requires that equal importance be given to English and French. Last year, Air Canada lost a lawsuit, and had to pay a six-figure fine to a Frenc...

Add Synced Question

×