moved by
1,763 views
3 3 votes

Mosquitoes pose a threat to human health. Controlling mosquitoes using chemicals may have undesired consequences. In Florida, authorities have used genetically modified mosquitoes to control the overall mosquito population. It remains to be seen if this novel approach has unforeseen consequences.

Which one of the following is the correct logical inference based on the information in the above passage?

  1. Using chemicals to kill mosquitoes is better than using genetically modified mosquitoes because genetic engineering is dangerous
  2. Using genetically modified mosquitoes is better than using chemicals to kill mosquitoes because they do not have any side effects
  3. Both using genetically modified mosquitoes and chemicals have undesired consequences and can be dangerous
  4. Using chemicals to kill mosquitoes may have undesired consequences but it is not clear if using genetically modified mosquitoes has any negative consequence

4 Answers

Best answer
3 3 votes

The passage states that controlling mosquitoes using chemicals ${\color{Red} \text{ may have undesired consequences.}}$

However, it does not provide any information about whether using genetically modified mosquitoes has any ${\color{Magenta} \text{ negative consequences or not}}$ as made clear by this sentence: “It remains to be seen if this novel approach has unforeseen consequences”

Therefore, we cannot make a definitive judgment about the safety or potential negative consequences of genetically modified mosquitoes based on the information provided in the passage.

Correct Answer: D

selected by
0 0 votes

(D) Using chemicals to kill mosquitoes may have undesired consequences but it is not clear if using genetically modified mosquitoes has any negative consequence.

Here's why the other options are not accurate:

  • (A) This statement makes a strong claim without sufficient evidence. The passage only mentions that chemicals may have consequences, not definitively states that they are worse than genetic engineering.
  • (B) This statement similarly lacks proof. The passage acknowledges the lack of knowledge about long-term effects of genetically modified mosquitoes.
  • (C) While the passage mentions potential downsides of both methods, it doesn't necessarily imply that both are equally dangerous or bad.

Therefore, option (D) accurately reflects the cautious stance presented in the passage. It acknowledges the possible risks of chemical use while highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the consequences of genetically modified mosquitoes.

0 0 votes

 It remains to be seen if this novel approach has unforeseen consequences.

this statement clearly indicates that genetical modified mosquitoes usage result is unclear for now and with time the things will become more clear. 

moved by
Answer:
Position:
Show:

Related questions

5 5 votes
3 3 answers
2.4k
2.4k views
Arjun asked Feb 15, 2022
2,415 views
In a class of five students $\text{P, Q, R, S}$ and $\text{T},$ only one student is known to have copied in the exam. The disciplinary committee has investigated the situ...
5 5 votes
1 answers 1 answer
721
721 views
Milicevic3306 asked Mar 27, 2018
721 views
The overwhelming number of people infected with rabies in India has been flagged by the World Health Organization as a source of concern. It is estimated that inoculating...
6 6 votes
3 answers 3 answers
608
608 views
Milicevic3306 asked Mar 25, 2018
608 views
For submitting tax returns, all resident males with annual income below $Rs$ $10$ lakh should fill upForm $P$ and all resident females with income below $Rs$ $8$ lakh sho...
7 7 votes
2 2 answers
2.3k
2.3k views
admin asked May 20, 2023
2,345 views
Forestland is a planet inhabited by different kinds of creatures. Among other creatures, it is populated by animals all of whom are ferocious. There are also creatures th...

Add Synced Question

×